Home > 20th Century, Carrière Jean-Claude, French Literature, History of Spain, Novel > The Controversy of Valladolid, by Jean-Claude Carrière

The Controversy of Valladolid, by Jean-Claude Carrière

September 11, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

The Controversy of Valladolid by Jean-Claude Carrière.

The Controversy of Valladolid is a novel based on historical facts. According to Wikipedia: “The Valladolid debate (1550–1551) concerned the treatment of natives of the New World. Held in the Spanish city of Valladolid, it opposed two main attitudes towards the conquests of the Americas. Dominican friar and Bishop of Chiapas, Bartolomé de las Casas argued that the Amerindians were free men in the natural order and deserved the same treatment as others, according to Catholic theology. Opposing him was fellow Dominican Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda, who insisted the Indians were natural slaves, and therefore reducing them to slavery or serfdom was in accordance with Catholic theology and natural law. Las Casas and Sepúlveda each later claimed to have won the debate, but no record supporting either claim exists. The debate had no clear effect on the treatment of the natives, it did ensure that the 1542 New Laws, which were initially designed to abolish the encomienda system, were to remain in effect.”

The encomienda system consisted in giving lands with all their resources (forests, water, peasants, mines) to soldiers. Natives became slaves.

 In the foreword, Jean-Claude Carrière explains that Las Casas and Sepúlveda may not have had their argument face to face. The controversy was probably lead through letters, which were actually publicly discussed. As a novelist, Jean-Claude Carrière decided to create this physical confrontation of ideas to enforce the drama. However, the reasoning is accurate and come from historical documentation. In the novel, the verbal fight takes place in a monastery. Las Casas and Sepúlveda are there with their assistants and their documentation. The Cardinal Roncieri was sent by the Pope to act as an arbitrator and will decide of the position the Roman Catholic Church will officially have on that matter.

 There were 20 millions people in the New World. Many of them were killed by Spanish or died because of the new diseases brought from Europe. Las Casas gives details on the maltreatments of Indians. Slaughter and torture are the appropriate words for the treatment of them by Spanish conquistadores.

I will not describe here all the ideas each opponent puts forward to win the fight. The argument is interesting but it is even more fascinating to read how literally narrow-minded they are. Their thoughts are limited by certitudes. Some fixed points cannot be moved without shaking the foundations of their lives. Christianity is the Truth. There is only one God. It is more important to save the Indians’ soul than provide them with decent living conditions. Jean-Claude Carrière describes the Cardinal Roncieri thinking after he has heard the two rivals:

“As educated and trained as his mind may be, as adroit his intelligence, as alert his conscience, all these precious qualities have a limit, which is precisely the truth. On Cardinal Roncieri, this truth works as a cage where he is born and in which he grew up, without ever seeing it was a cage. Outside of it, in the darkness, are the territories of ignorance and errors, which are reluctant to enter into the cage to such a point that one must force them in. Only in the cage, hold by the benevolent hand of the Creator, prevails the peace and tranquillity of certitude. In the cage only is the world properly laid down” (sorry for the poor translation)

That passage says everything and applies both to Sepúlveda and Las Casas. The first, who has never left Europe, is certain that Indians are not human, of if they are, they can only be of lower category, which authorizes slavery. If they were men equal to Europeans, he cannot imagine that these people could refuse to become Christians. He judges them as idolatrous and sinners. God has abandoned them and he wants the Spanish to punish them, just as he wanted them to push the Moors out of Spain. Their condition is the will of God. Las Casas, who has spent most of his life in the New World, feels that Indians are humans but lacks the words to conclusively prove it. His vision of Indians, tolerant and kind, would demand a “relativity” of belief, the idea that several religions can coexist. But admitting this would go too far and oblige him to break his cage. So his demonstration has always embarrassing flaws. Their thinking evolves in a restricted playing field. Expanding it is unconceivable. When Galileo will expose his theories fifty years later, the Church will prove her incapacity to accept changes.

The idea of two worlds growing apart, ignoring one another and finally meeting struck me. Of course I knew it had happened but I had never paused for a moment or tried to visualize the scene. I realized how astonishing and unthinkable it must have been. How can we imagine that? It must have been as if we discovered the existence of other men on another planet, except that we are probably more prepared to this idea than the people of 1492 were.

In fact, the theological debate was just a pretext, religion was used for more earthly and greedy aims. Spain needed the Church to confirm that God was on her side, that she was entitled to possess these countries and all their wealth. Accepting Las Casas’ theory would have required to pay the Indians for their work. It would have reduced the profits made of the encomienda  and less gold and wealth to be sent back home.  The justification of Spanish military and economical domination on the New World was more at stake than the moral quest on humanity.

 The Controversy of Valladolid is well written. Jean-Claude Carrière succeeds in bringing serious ideas in a lively debate and in providing just the appropriate level of historical details. The theological part is easy to understand for a modern reader and the description of the historical context is really interesting. Of course, as Carrière is a scenarist, he is skilled at creating an atmosphere and bringing new developments to keep the attention of the reader. 

I had a nice time reading The Controversy of Valladolid and learnt many things.  A film adaptation was shot in 1992 and Jean-Pierre Marielle played the part of Las Casas and Jean-Louis Trintignant of Sepúlveda

  1. September 11, 2010 at 9:05 pm

    I thought there had to be a film version after looking at the cover. Too bad they didn’t get rid of the Ecomienda. Makes you wonder how history would have been different.

    • September 11, 2010 at 9:21 pm

      I know, I wonder too. I’m always surprised how quickly entire civilizations or cultures disappeared. It’s the same for Indians in the USA. Jean-Claude Carrière ironically ends the book by Cardinal Roncieri deciding that if Indians are part of mankind and can’t be slaves, then the Church should authorize to bring Africans in the New World. They, for sure, are not men (!!) and well, someone has to work for the Ecomienda. Chilling.

  2. September 14, 2010 at 7:24 pm

    I can often identify with various characters and issues in history but when it comes to those racial attitudes, it’s really impossible for me to understand how people acted that way (even though I know that it was accepted etc).

    • September 14, 2010 at 8:47 pm

      I think it is hard for us to understand the world before the universal values of the Age of Enlightenment. They just lived in another set of values, as different from us as if we now decided that France is in the Southern hemisphere.
      I don’t understand it either, just as I don’t understand that we needed the 19th century and Darwin to notice similarities between monkeys and us. It seems so obvious now when you observe gorillas in a zoo.

      What is more disturbing for me is how someone who claims to be a Christian can behave like this. Las Casas felt that. I’m not religious but for me Christian religion is based on equality between men, so really, it sounds like the antithesis of racial attitudes. (But we’re talking of people who also seriously wondered if women had a soul.)

      What never changed though is that money rules the world and that moral compass should always point in such a direction as to not disturb economical activities or organized pillage.

  3. September 21, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    The investigation of the parameters of the argument is interesting. The clash between the rightness of Las Casas’s instinct for equal treatment with the logic of his theology which makes his instinctive position untenable is particularly intriguing.

    Was it a long novel out of interest?

    • September 21, 2010 at 2:10 pm

      It was really interesting and easy to read. It’s worth reading it, I think. I’d like to watch the film version now.

      It’s a short novel, my paperback copy is only 189 pages.

  4. October 22, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    There is an exhibit named “The Gold of the Inca people” at La Pinacothèque in Paris. I visited it today and here is a text which explains pretty clearly what gold and silver represented for the people living in Peru when the Spaniards arrived:

    “More than a metal, gold was the first and everlasting flame, it was the “Sun god’s sweat” the most important deity in the Pre-Columbian Pantheon, the virile and seminal principle. As for silver, linked to feminity, to fecundity, to water: it was the “Moon’s tears” the Mama Quilla, sister and wife of the Sun.
    Gold and silver are proof of the divine at the heart of Mother Earth, and their transformation meant not only mastery of the metallurgical techniques but also a perfect knowledge of cosmology, of mythology and religious beliefs. The one who owned them became the intercessor of the gods, he was invested with a cosmic, divine, power.
    Metal was a living substance that they thought of as a kind of embryo or grain capable of reproducing itself thanks to the intervention of the Pachamama. (the Earth)”

    When gold and silver were money for the Spaniards, they were divine for the natives of Peru. Could there have been more different point of views?

    PS : I love the image of god’s sweat and moon’s tears, it’s so poetic.

  5. Nancy Sanhueza
    June 30, 2011 at 2:47 pm

    I live in England and I have not been able to get a copy of this book, which it was recommended by a french friend. Please if anyone can help, it can be a copy either in English or Spanish.

    Thank you
    Nancy

  1. April 7, 2012 at 10:17 pm
  2. April 27, 2014 at 6:38 am

I love to hear your thoughts, thanks for commenting

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: