Vendettas

Vendetta by Honoré de Balzac. 1830.

I decided to join Caroline and Danielle in their readalong of Vendetta by Balzac. It is part of our contribution to Thyme for Tea and Bookbath’s July in Paris. Vendetta is part of La Comédie Humaine, in Scènes de la vie privée.

The story starts in 1800, i.e. when Bonaparte was First Consul, before he had the French Senate proclaimed him Emperor in 1804. The Piombos arrive in Paris after a vendetta with the Porta that decimated both families. A vendetta is a do-it-yourself justice. You don’t rely on the State justice but feel entitled to kill anyone belonging to the family you have a vendetta with. As Corsicans, the Piombos go to Napoléon and the father serves the Bonapartist administration.

In 1815, the Piombo family is still is Paris and are well-off now. Their daughter Ginevra loves to paint and takes painting lessons at Servin’s. He’s the most fashionable painting teacher among the high society and young girls from different families meet in his studio. It is just after the Restauration and Napoleon’s failed comeback to power. The aristocracy is triumphant and the Bonapartists are defeated.

As a Corsican, Ginevra is of course a fervent admirer of Napoleon. So when she realises that Servin hides Luigi, a former soldier of the Great Army in the studio, she doesn’t report it to the authorities but helps concealing his presence to the other students. As the reader expects, they fall in love and want to marry but Ginevra’s father is strongly opposed to this marriage, on the one hand because he doesn’t want to lose his daughter and on the other hand because Luigi is a survivor from the Porta family and the vendetta is still running.

It’s a short book but nonetheless full of thought-provoking events and descriptions.

Of course, the theme reminded me of Romeo and Juliet and I know Balzac admired Shakespeare a lot. We have the same ingredients here with these two young persons genuinely in love with each other and disregarding their family hate.

Balzac also insists on the particularity of Corsican temper all along this novella. According to him, it’s a lethal combination of pride, stubbornness and courage associated to a strong identity as a Corsican. The parents would rather turn their back on their daughter than accept her marriage with Luigi. Actually, Corsica has always had a very strong culture and it remains even today. One of their specialties is bombing public buildings to claim for their independence. These terrorist attacks rarely kill people but cost a lot of money. It’s become part of the folklore, of every day life. Allow me just an anecdote. There was an earthquake in the Mediterranean Sealately. The epicentre was somewhere between Marseille and Corsica. The morning after, you get to hear the habitual interviews on the radio: “how did you feel?”, “did you realise what was happening?”, blah blah blah. On the continent, the interviewee would have talked about her puzzlement. In Corsica, the interviewee naively declares that at first she thought the earthquake was a huge bombing. Her first reflex thought is bombing, isn’t that incredible? Well, back to Balzac.  

I wondered why Balzac chose Corsicans as characters. Under the romance I could feel political ideas. Does Balzac want to criticize Bonaparte through this Corsican family? He was a royalist and had little consideration for Napoleon. By describing the circle of these young girls learning how to paint, Balzac shows us a representative sample of the French society at that time. The aristocratic girls stick together and look down on the Bonapartist girls. They despise them as the defeated, the ones whose families chose the wrong side. The climate in that studio is that of the aftermath of a civil war. It’s not the first time Balzac describes this and it is also part of The Red and the Black. Is the word vendetta also relevant to call the chase of Bonaparte’s partisans after the Restauration? Luigi had to hide and walking in a uniform of the Grande Armée wasn’t safe.

Apart from the political issues, Balzac also takes the opportunity to describe the relationships between a father and a daughter. The moment when Ginevra announces she wants to get married is awful. Even before knowing the name of the groom, the father doesn’t want her to leave him. He’d rather she remained single than let her marry. It sounded so selfish and so different from the usual behaviour of fathers in Balzac’s time. Getting married was the only decent destiny for a woman in those times and being a spinster was being a sort of loser without a safe social status. Her father is over 70, could die pretty soon and leave her alone. As a parent, you don’t raise children to keep them by your side.

Furthermore, I wondered if Balzac criticised love marriages as foolish and wanted to teach the reader that loveless but reasonable marriages. I felt him conservative on the subject and condemning Ginevra for living according to her feelings rather than surrendering to her parents’ will. That their will is inappropriate, selfish or not doesn’t matter. As a daughter, she should obey. He also shows the consequences of a marriage defying the social rules and the social cost of such a choice.

As always, Balzac is a fine painter of human nature in all its pettiness. The scenes in the studio when Ginevra is observed by a jealous aristocratic girl are priceless. It could take place in a classroom between contemporary teenagers.

I wasn’t thrilled by this novella but it’s interesting to read. You can find Caroline’s review here and Danielle’s here. Very interesting too and really better written as well.

Bonus post: Vendetta by Guy de Maupassant.

After reading Balzac’s Vendetta, I noticed that Maupassant had written an eponymous short-story. I was intrigued and wanted very much to compare them. It’s a short story, shorter than Balzac’s text.

Bonifacio, in Corsica. Antoine Saverini is killed by Nicolas Ravolati. Antoine’s old mother swears on his dead body that she will avenge him and declares a vendetta. Nicolas flees to Sardinia. The old woman has no family, so she’s well aware that no one will murder Nicolas if she doesn’t. But how can she kill a strong and young man? She will imagine an incredibly cruel and efficient way to get him.

I leave you the pleasure to discover how she did it. Maupassant was really a master in short stories. There isn’t any superfluous word, everything runs smoothly until the shocking ending. Better than Balzac.

If someone wants to read it, here is the pdf file: vendetta

  1. July 19, 2011 at 7:10 pm

    I had a similar reaction like you. I think he chose the theme because this was a romantic theme and very fashionable and following Mérimées outstanding story on Corsican Vendetta Mateo Falcone.
    Comapred to Mérimée this isn’t a convincing story but Balzac goes farther and creates one of his jealous father figures.
    Although I wasn’t totally impressed, I enjoyed reading it as it is such a typical 19th century story.
    I also like the end, after they get married and was upset to see Ginevra’s talent wasted.

    Like

    • July 19, 2011 at 7:14 pm

      Do you think this story had a political purpose?
      I haven’t read that Mérimée, I should try to find it.

      Like

      • July 19, 2011 at 8:22 pm

        Have you seen the film Prophet which focused on Corsican gangsters? From the film, I got the idea that there’s the clannish sentiment at work which also rather plays into the story. I agree you have to wonder if the Corsican reference meant something deeper.

        Like

        • July 19, 2011 at 8:43 pm

          No I haven’t seen that film. There’s a really good program on France Inter every Saturday at 1:30 pm named “Rendez-vous avec X”. It’s a former member of the secret services talking to a journalist and telling about political events and reading between the lines. (podcast available on Radio France web site, I suppose) I think that’s where I heard of Corsican gangsters committing suicide with 3 bullets in the back…
          Yes, there’s a clannish sentiment. Proper to islands? Proper to small countries?
          Anyway, Corsica is a beautiful place to visit. Blue sea, wild coasts, mountains and springs inside the country, all kinds of lanscapes.

          Like

        • July 19, 2011 at 8:49 pm

          A question, Guy: have you read Balzac’s bio?

          Like

  2. July 19, 2011 at 7:54 pm

    I’m not sure at all.
    It is a very good story, nothing like Vendetta. Vendetta feels like two stories in one.

    Like

    • July 19, 2011 at 8:45 pm

      It seems Mérimée’s story interfered with your reading of Vendetta. When you start reading and set your mind on something, it spoils the reading. (Like me with La Cousine Bette, do you remember?)

      Like

      • July 20, 2011 at 7:19 am

        I remember, yes. I guess this is what happened and there are parallels with Le Colonel Chabert too.
        I must say I wasn’t aware he was a royalist… I didn’t have a feeling he painted the aristocrats in a nicer way. just from reading this story I would have said he has more sympathies for the Bonapartists.

        Like

  3. July 20, 2011 at 3:49 am

    Sorry you are having problems viewing my blog–maybe try a different browser? At work I cannot see my page from IE (not sure why–it won’t load) but when I try Firefox Mozilla there is no problem. This is the first book/story I’ve read by Balzac and while reading it I assumed it was probably a lesser work but I’m still very curious about him–I’m afraid I knew nothing before reading along and Caroline’s and your post have been quite interesting to me. I also thought of Romeo and Juliet straight off but read about the Merimee story in the wikipedia. I think this is a fascinating period–also read that Balzac was a Royalist so wondered about his portrayal of the Piombos and Portas–quite bleak. It sounds as though he was quite an influence on later writers like Flaubert and Zola.

    Like

    • July 20, 2011 at 6:31 am

      I managed to read your review on my phone.
      I’m glad you liked it and as it was your first Balzac, I can tell you it’s not his best and that you have many wonderful books to discover.
      I recommend Eugénie Grandet, Father Goriot, Letter of Two Brides (very interesting on a feminist point of view) and Cousin Betty.
      Balzac influenced later writers of the 19thC but also Marcel Proust.

      Like

  4. leroyhunter
    July 20, 2011 at 10:45 am

    Just to echo Guy on the movie Un Prophet: I thought it was superb.

    I’m most interested in the Maupassant story you mention…nice bonus.

    Like

    • July 20, 2011 at 12:03 pm

      I’ll try to watch the film, thanks.
      If you want to read Maupassant’s Vendetta, I’ve added the pdf file at the end of the post. In French but I’m sure you can read it anyway.

      Like

    • July 20, 2011 at 10:32 pm

      Leroy: Two more recs–M R 73 and Paris Lockdown.

      Like

  5. July 20, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    When I read your post yesterday I had a feeling, I knew Maupassants story and now I saw that it is in one of the collections I have. I read it again and…. what a difference, so well written and it is only 6 pages long. More and more I think that Balzac chose the wrong theme. I found it really bad how clichéd he described the Corsicans and not because he evokes the vendetta, the vendetta was part of their culture, that is obvious. It is everything else that is clichéd. Lucky he didn’t attempt to describe Corsica.

    Like

    • July 20, 2011 at 12:58 pm

      It’s more a question of being good at writing short stories, I think.
      In the Balzac, the introduction in Paris in 1800 is too long, the conversation with Napoleon useless. Then he has to rush to finish. In the Maupassant, everything is well balanced. You’re reading a full story and you don’t have the impression its an aborted novel.

      Like

      • July 20, 2011 at 7:30 pm

        Balzac is one of my all time favs, but I get the feeling that his writing isn’t, at times, that disciplined. In spite of his flaws, though, he hits my top ten list.

        Like

  6. July 20, 2011 at 1:18 pm

    Yes, true but he treats the topic of the Corsicans in a different way as well. I think that even Le Colonel Chabert had a rushed feel. I think Guy said he thought the movie was superior because it was more elaborate. Le Chef-d’oeuvre inconnu is one of the most famous stories of Blazac… I’m curious to read it, I got it here. It was also made into a movie, La Belle Noiseuse.
    I can’t remember, did you say you liked Une Passion dans le Désert?

    Like

    • July 20, 2011 at 1:25 pm

      Yes, Maupassant isn’t judgmental whereas Balzac is. (He generally is, btw. That’s why I always wonder if he has political or other motives)
      I liked Une passion dans le désert. It’s strange though and very different from what you could expect from Balzac.
      I also read Le chef d’oeuvre inconnu last year but I didn’t write a post about it. It was too difficult for me to write about it, I lacked the vocabulary.

      Like

  7. July 20, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    I believe Danielle called it a “moral tale”, quite true. I’m so not sure about his political motives but it is possible. I have a feeling that he doesn’t think too well about human nature in general.

    Like

  8. July 20, 2011 at 7:28 pm

    No, I haven’t read it. I’ve dipped into it at certain points but that’s about it.

    Like

  1. No trackbacks yet.

I love to hear your thoughts, thanks for commenting. Comments in French are welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: