La délicatesse by David Foenkinos. 2009. 210 pages. The English translation, Delicacy (PS) will be released in English (UK) in December 2011.
Let’s rewind my last weeks’ readings: a book about working conditions in the 21st century, a book about a French widow bullied at work by her boss, a book about poverty and poor working conditions in Paris in the 1920s, an improbable love story in Sweden between a young widow and a farmer, an autobiography full of literary references.
Now, I managed to read a book about a romance in an office between a young French widow and a Swedish employee with literary references in the text. Bizarre.
Nathalie meets, falls for and marries François. Nathalie finds a job in a company. Her boss Charles is in love with her but she’s very married. Charles’s hopes remain silent. François is run over by a car. Nathalie mourns. Nathalie works. Nathalie is available. Charles is still in love with her and now his hopes skyrocket. But Nathalie kisses the insignificant and colourless Markus. His hopes skyrocket and Charles’s hopes plummet. By the coffee machine, gossips go up and down around Nathalie. It is well known that:
To evaluate the strength of a gossip, you only have to check the takings of the coffee machine. Today, it would be historical.
The plot is rather banal but the structure is original. It is split into 117 chapters (the number means something) and some chapters are an excerpt of a song, a statistic, a definition. All are related to the story.
End of Chapter 44
“I’d like to know why you kissed me.”
“I don’t know”, Nathalie whispered.
Markus would have wanted an answer, even a rejection, but certainly not this nothing.
– You don’t know?
– No, I don’t
– You can’t leave me that way, you owe me an explanation.”
There is nothing to say.
This kiss was like modern art.
Title of a painting by Kasimir Malevich
Suprematist Composition: White on White (1918)
It is full of gratuitous comments by the writer and funny phrases from Markus with his dry sense of humour. It also relates how relationships are based on funny misunderstandings.
It was a quick read (less than 3 hours). It’s simply written but with nice images:
When leaving that Friday night, he was really happy to take shelter in the week-end. He would use Saturday and Sunday as two big blankets
Although I didn’t buy La délicatesse, it strangely echoed with books I’ve just read. It’s delicate and witty. A good novel to take on a train.